That’s because both are rich in calories yet low in fiber, a nutrient that helps reduce hunger and promote feelings of fullness ( 10, 11, 12). Still, soda is likely harmful to your health, regardless of the amount you consume, whereas fruit juice may only increase your risk of disease when drunk in large amounts.īoth fruit juice and sugary soda may increase your risk of weight gain. summaryįruit juice and soda contain similar amounts of sugar. That said, the health benefits of juice only apply to 100% fruit juice - not to sugar-sweetened fruit beverages. Only higher intakes appear to be detrimental to your health ( 2). On the other hand, drinking small amounts of juice - specifically less than 5 ounces (150 ml) per day - may lower your risk of conditions like type 2 diabetes and heart disease. This means that the more soda you drink, the higher your risk of disease - even if you only drink small amounts. However, soda and juice are unlikely to affect your health in the same ways ( 2).įor instance, soda tends to increase your risk of disease in a dose-dependent manner. Research consistently shows a link between sugary drinks and a higher risk of illness, such as type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, high blood pressure, and heart disease, as well as a higher risk of premature death ( 5, 6, 7, 8, 9).ĭue to their similar sugar contents, some people have started grouping juices and soda together, suggesting that they should be avoided to an equal extent. Polyethylene tubes and Isosource HN with fibre were less likely to clog than silicone tubes and Novasource Renal.One of the main reasons some people consider fruit juice as unhealthy as sugary soda is the sugar content of these beverages.īoth soda and 100% fruit juice pack around 110 calories and 20–26 grams of sugar per cup (240 ml) ( 3, 4). We concluded that apple juice and cola have less tube clogging potential than orange juice, and thus may be considered as primary treatment options for hypoglycemia in enterally fed patients. A significant difference was found between tube type and enteral formula: polyethylene tubes had higher average flow rates than silicone tubes (P < 0.0001), and Isosource HN with fibre had higher flow rates than Novasource Renal (P = 0.01). The results showed that the glucose therapy agent choice affected flow rates: apple juice and cola had higher average flow rates than orange juice (P = 0.01). Flow-rate measurements were collected at 2 h intervals. Each tube was irrigated with 1 glucose therapy agent, providing approximately 20 g of carbohydrate every 4 h. Each feeding set was filled with Isosource HN with fibre or Novasource Renal. For this study, 12 gastrostomy tubes (6 polyethylene and 6 silicone) were set at 50 mL/h. To develop evidence-based hypoglycemia treatment protocols in patients receiving total enteral nutrition, this study determined the effect on enteral tube flow of glucose therapy agents: apple juice, orange juice, and cola, and it also examined the effects of tube type and feed type with these glucose therapy agents.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |